Michael Barrymore 'kept Stuart Lubbock pool death in spotlight' says his father
3 February 2020, 10:43
The father of a man found dead in TV presenter Michael Barrymore's pool nearly 20 years ago has thanked the entertainer for "keeping the case in the public eye".
Terry Lubbock, whose son Stuart tragically drowned at Barrymore's then-home in Roydon, Essex in March 2001, said that the entertainer has helped his fight to get justice for his son enormously.
74-year-old Mr Lubbock also said that an upcoming documentary about his son's death should be of great help to police investigating his son's death.
The new programme charts the police's investigation into the death, as well as the attempts by entertainer Barrymore to restore his public image following the incident.
Speaking to LBC News, Mr Lubbock called today a "milestone after nearly 19 years".
He continued: "There's money involved now, which I think will help.
"The young girls who were at that that party, they were 18, they're now 36 or 37, and they've got children who must be following this."
"I'm not well now and I've seen the best years of my life," Mr Lubbock, of Harlow, Essex, said.
"All I live for is to see Stuart get justice, and I'm determined that I will live to see Stuart get justice.
"Michael Barrymore is a very, very clever man and he wants to be in the limelight and he wants to be back on television."
He continued: "And he has helped me enormously. He's kept this in the news and I thank him for it.
"I cannot imagine Stuart would still be getting all this attention without Michael Barrymore."
Mr Lubbock added: "Stuart was 31 when he died. He'd be 50 now. People had said to me, 'why don't you put this behind you? Your son has gone'.
"But how can you forget your child? I dream about Stuart. To me his death seems like it was weeks ago, not 19 years ago.
"As long as I keep breathing I won't stop fighting for him. And anyone who had anything to do with what happened to him had better realise that.
"I have seen this documentary. It's very good. I think it's going to push the door open a bit more. I think it's going to help get justice for Stuart. I'd urge everyone to watch it."
Mr Lubbock told the documentary that the fallout has "smothered everything that was good" about his son.
And he said trying to solve the mystery had "consumed" him and left him exhausted.
At the beginning of the 90-minute programme, the 999 call reporting the incident to police is played.
The caller said: "A fella has drowned in the pool. We have got him out.
"There's a party going on and someone has just gone out and found him. I think the geezer's dead mate."
Stuart's death has been a subject of a lot of controversy, with conflicting theories surrounding the events that night.
Mr Lubbock told the makers of the documentary: "This thing is so big that it smothered everything that was good about my son Stuart. I feel exhausted but it is still in me to carry on.
"How can a father dismiss the questions that have got to be answered about my son's murder?"
He added: "I hope to God that Stuart was on another planet and that he didn't feel pain."
In the programme, DCI Stephen Jennings said that he believes Stuart was "raped and murdered that night" at Barrymore's Roydon home.
"Somebody at that party knows what happened," he added.
He said that items from the house including a pool thermometer had gone missing after it was initially searched by police.
Stuart's brother Kevin Lubbock also told the programme that there was a "wall of silence" surrounding the death.
"I just want to move on and get on with my life," he said. "Stuart was the best brother in the world, he was everything you could want really."
Last year, Barrymore spoke out about the death, telling Piers Morgan's ITV show Life Stories that he "couldn't be more sorry" for his behaviour that night, and that he is "100% innocent".
The TV star was arrested in 2007 but never charged with any offence.
He sued Essex Police and claimed it was a wrongful arrest that had cost him around £2.5 million in lost earnings, but Court of Appeal judges concluded he would be entitled to only "nominal" damages.
