Postal workers’ union loses appeal against Royal Mail High Court injunction blocking strikes
28 November 2019, 18:37
The postal workers’ union has lost an appeal against a High Court injunction blocking strikes by its members.
The Communication Workers Union (CWU) attempted to overturn an injunction granted to Royal Mail to block industrial action amid a dispute over job security and employment terms.
The postal service claimed the vote for industrial action - supported by 97 per cent on a 76 per cent turnout - was invalid because members had been encouraged to open their voting papers at work before they were delivered to their homes.
But the appeal was dismissed on Thursday afternoon, with the Court of Appeal ruling that "the conduct of the union... had the effect of amounting to interference" with the voting process.
We have just left the High Court. Our appeal was dismissed. 6 hours of evidence and they took 2 minutes to come to a decision.— The CWU (@CWUnews) November 28, 2019
The justice system in this country is an absolute farce.
Stand by your postal worker #WeRiseAgain 🦁
Lord Justice Males, sitting with Lady Justice Simler and Sir Patrick Elias, said that "the union did not intend to do anything unlawful", but ruled that the ballot was nonetheless invalid.
The court will give its full reasons for its decision at a later date.
Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice, the CWU's senior deputy general secretary Tony Kearns said it was "the clear democratic will of the employees of Royal Mail and members of the CWU to take strike action, as is their human right".
He added: "And we've seen here today, in a matter of seconds, three appeal court judges override that democracy."
Mr Kearns said the union would now consider having another ballot, but would wait until the court's full ruling was published.
The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court Injunction over CWU's postal ballot.— Royal Mail News (@royalmailnews) November 28, 2019
Read our full statement here: https://t.co/ktV1m3Z9RM
Earlier, the Court of Appeal heard that the "substantial" dispute between the CWU and Royal Mail was unlikely to be resolved "without a real threat of industrial action".
The CWU's barrister Lord Hendy QC argued that the injunction "effectively overrode an overwhelming vote to strike" on the basis of "trivial" infringements.
He submitted that the CWU "merely encouraged members to vote at work", adding that "far from subverting" the voting process, "the steps the appellant took were all to ensure each member received his or her ballot paper".
But Bruce Carr QC, for Royal Mail, said the workplace interception of ballot papers "was no spontaneous act - those who voted in this way were following the instructions given to them by the CWU".
He added: "The extent to which the instructions were implemented is demonstrated by the geographical breadth of the evidence obtained thus far by Royal Mail Group."
Mr Carr argued that "the CWU had subverted the ballot process ... by directing its members to retrieve their ballot papers and cast their votes at work".